|
|
by Michael
Mims, President/CEO of K&M Technology Group
|
This is the second article in a
short series that will address cementing issues, from
a well construction engineers perspective, for
extended reach and complex well designs. The previous
article addressed primary cementing concerns from
a mechanical standpoint. This article will continue
on the subject of Primary Cementing, however, we will
look at cement slurry designs and advanced placement
techniques for these slurries to maximize their effectiveness
in these difficult wellbore environments.
A key aspect to successfully designing
a primary cementing program for high angle wellbores
is to fully understand the impact of the internal
and external flow regimes. Inside of the pipe, the
classic bullet flow profile and varying
fluid viscosities can act to pump the middle out of
fluid sections if they are not mechanically separated.
In the annulus, the casing will not be concentric
and fluid flow is going to take the path of least
resistance. This will create areas of little-to-no
flow around the casing and present major challenges
during both the hole clean-up and cement placement
operations. These problems become more severe as the
hole sizes and casing sizes increase, making surface
and intermediate casing strings the most challenging.
Further complicating these operations
has been the introduction of mandrel casing hangers
to the industry. The inherent risk of sticking the
pipe off of bottom, along with the operational difficulties
associated with emergency slip systems makes the likelihood
of using pipe movement during the cementing operation
very small (even if you can move the pipe). Therefore,
the use of spacer trains (as discussed in the previous
article), a properly engineered cement slurry and
the use of an appropriate placement technique is critical
to the success of the operation.
Cement Slurry Design
Our team has worked on design teams
for most of the major operators over the past 10 years
in various parts of the world. It has been a rare
occasion where the cementing designs have received
the amount of engineering attention that is warranted
in these difficult wells. In fact, in recent years,
the service companies have been given more and more
of the responsibility for technical support and in
many cases they have been ill-prepared to deal with
this added responsibility. The result has almost always
been a cementing program that simply looks at pipe
centralization, thickening times and water loss and
then the program is sent to the field.
Slurry design has several key elements
that must be considered in detail when designing a
cementing program for ER or complex wells:
- Bottom Hole Temperature is commonly overestimated
by using either production data or data from MWD
tools while the hole is being drilled. During the
cementing operation, cold fluid is being pumped
downhole ahead of and during the cementing operation.
This creates slurries with thickening times that
are much longer than necessary.
- Cement Quality Class G cement is an extremely
small portion (~1%) of the cement that is manufactured
in the world. In order to make Class G cement, the
plant must clean-out its construction grade cement
and run a production of Class G. Weve found
many instances when cement has not met API specifications.
Transport method and storage time will also have
an effect of cement quality.
- Ability of additives to work in the expected
temperature environment Many of the products
being used in the industry today is extremely temperature
sensitive. Sodium silicate extenders are a good
example of this phenomenon. When slurries are designed
with overestimated BHTs, the effect of these products
on fluid properties and thickening times can be
misrepresented. It is relatively simple for tests
to be run over an expected range of temperatures
to ensure the applicability of the products being
used.
- Size of the Slurry ER wells often run
strings of casing that require all of the cement
on-board to be mixed and pumped. These very large
slurries are often designed with the same properties
even though their pump times may be hours from start
to finish. A properly designed cement job will set
from the bottom, up to ensure that hydrostatic pressure
is maintained on the lowermost slurry as it develops
gel strength. This may not be the case if a very
large slurry is being pumped with the same design
properties.
Walking Squeeze Technique
The primary goal of most surface
and intermediate casing cement jobs is to get a competent
shoe. This has proven very challenging in large casing/hole
sizes and/or when pump rates are restricted due to
rig capability.
With the pipe being pulled to the
low side of the hole by gravity, most of the fluid
flow will occur on the high side of the annulus. This
makes the removal of cuttings and sludge on the low
side of the hole very difficult and can create a low-side
channel. The high angle of ER wellbores also makes
getting complete displacement to the top of the annulus
difficult which can create a high-side channel.
The Walking Squeeze
is a technique that was developed in order to combat
the problems with high and low-side channeling. This
technique requires that the tail slurry be designed
with a realistic thickening time equal to the pump
time of the slurry. The cement is mixed, pumped and
displaced using standard techniques until approximately
20 bbls remains in the displacement. The pumps are
then slowed to 1 bpm and the displacement is completed
at this very slow rate.
The concept is that the tail cement
that is already around the shoe when the displacement
is slowed it will begin to develop gel strength. The
remaining cement will be displaced into the path of
least resistance, which should be the high and low-side
channels in the annulus. Walking squeezes are now
a common practice in our client wells and they have
virtually eliminated remedial shoe jobs.
The final article in this series
will address liner running and cementing, remedial
cementing and cement plugs as they apply to ER and
complex wells.
# # #
(as published in the Chevron
newsletter)